From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263049AbUB0RAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:00:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263050AbUB0RAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:00:25 -0500 Received: from delerium.kernelslacker.org ([81.187.208.145]:13239 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263049AbUB0RAV (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:00:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:58:26 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: "Kevin P. Fleming" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: S390 block devs on !s390. Message-ID: <20040227165826.GA9352@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Kevin P. Fleming" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel References: <20040227135728.GA15016@redhat.com> <403F7431.80608@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403F7431.80608@backtobasicsmgmt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:45:37AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > >This is probably useless on x86 for eg.. > >(Everything else in this file is dependant on some other s390 feature, > > so only this one shows up). Too bad the drivers/s390/block stuff gets > >source'd at all on !s390. > > Doesn't the config language support wrapping the entire KConfig file (or > even a higher level one) with "if ARCH_S390"? All that does is add a > "depends ARCH_S390" to everything in the file, but it would sure be a > lot easier to maintain. Sure, you force a bool to y if ARCH=S390 at the top. That would work. Probably. Dave