From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched domains kernbench improvements
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:59:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402282159.58452.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
Hi Nick
> So it is more a matter of tuning than anything fundamental
Geez I know how you feel... :-D
I tried it on the X440 with sched smt disabled
better than before but still slower than vanilla on half load; however better
than vanilla on optimal and full load now! I wonder whether the worse result
on half load is as relevant since this is 8x HT cpus?
Full details:
vanilla:
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 120.186
User Time 800.614
System Time 92.604
Percent CPU 742.4
Context Switches 10430.6
Sleeps 26554.6
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.67
User Time 1009.54
System Time 113.614
Percent CPU 1374.6
Context Switches 63728
Sleeps 41399.4
Average Maximum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 83.148
User Time 1014.54
System Time 123.806
Percent CPU 1368.4
Context Switches 45229.6
Sleeps 22077.6
-mm no SMT (sorry didnt do max load):
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 133.51
User Time 799.268
System Time 92.784
Percent CPU 669
Context Switches 19340.8
Sleeps 24427.4
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.486
User Time 1006.37
System Time 106.952
Percent CPU 1366.8
Context Switches 33939
Sleeps 32453.4
-mm less idle:
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 128.23
User Time 819.256
System Time 93.09
Percent CPU 713
Context Switches 18566.2
Sleeps 24663.8
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 79.844
User Time 1004.26
System Time 106.74
Percent CPU 1391.8
Context Switches 33718
Sleeps 33007.8
Average Maximum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.47
User Time 1008.32
System Time 119.652
Percent CPU 1384.4
Context Switches 31296.6
Sleeps 22667.6
Con
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 10:59 Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-02-28 11:15 ` sched domains kernbench improvements Nick Piggin
2004-02-28 11:18 ` Con Kolivas
2004-02-28 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-28 12:27 ` Con Kolivas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-28 9:21 Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402282159.58452.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox