From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262063AbUB2QRW (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:17:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262066AbUB2QRW (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:17:22 -0500 Received: from hell.org.pl ([212.244.218.42]:57865 "HELO hell.org.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262063AbUB2QRT (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:17:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:17:21 +0100 From: Karol Kozimor To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? Message-ID: <20040229161721.GA16688@hell.org.pl> References: <1ulUA-33w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ulUA-33w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Pavel Machek: > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK? > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided > by swsusp, and it is confusing users... It may be ugly, it may be unmaintained, but I get the impression that it works for some people for whom swsusp doesn't. So unless swsusp works for everyone or Nigel's swsusp2 is merged, I'd suggest leaving that in. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan@hell.org.pl