From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262090AbUB2SLT (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:11:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262092AbUB2SLT (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:11:19 -0500 Received: from gprs154-126.eurotel.cz ([160.218.154.126]:42114 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262090AbUB2SLK (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:11:10 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:10:53 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: M?ns Rullg?rd Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? Message-ID: <20040229181053.GD286@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1ulUA-33w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <20040229161721.GA16688@hell.org.pl> <20040229162317.GC283@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >> > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK? > >> > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided > >> > by swsusp, and it is confusing users... > >> > >> It may be ugly, it may be unmaintained, but I get the impression that it > >> works for some people for whom swsusp doesn't. So unless swsusp works for > >> everyone or Nigel's swsusp2 is merged, I'd suggest leaving that in. > > > > Do you have example when pmdisk works and swsusp does not? I'm not > > aware of any in recent history... > > For me, none of them (pmdisk, swsusp and swsusp2) work. I did manage > to get pmdisk to resume once, and swsusp2 makes it half-way through > the resume. The old swsusp doesn't even get that far. Try current swsusp with minimal drivers, init=/bin/bash. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]