From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH][3/3] Update CVS KGDB's wrt connect / detach
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:42:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403011342.53980.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040226160523.GB28873@nevyn.them.org>
On Thursday 26 Feb 2004 9:35 pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:41:55AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > > On Thursday 26 Feb 2004 3:23 am, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > The following patch fixes a number of little issues here and there,
> > > > and ends up making things more robust.
> > > > - We don't need kgdb_might_be_resumed or kgdb_killed_or_detached.
> > > > GDB attaching is GDB attaching, we haven't preserved any of the
> > > > previous context anyhow.
> > >
> > > If gdb is restarted, kgdb has to remove all breakpoints. Present kgdb
> > > does that in the code this patch removes:
> > >
> > > - if (remcom_in_buffer[0] == 'H' && remcom_in_buffer[1] == 'c') {
> > > - remove_all_break();
> > > - atomic_set(&kgdb_killed_or_detached, 0);
> > > - ok_packet(remcom_out_buffer);
> > >
> > > If we don't remove breakpoints, they stay in kgdb without gdb not
> > > knowing it and causes consistency problems.
> >
> > Er, what do you mean 'restarted' ? If gdb somehow disconnects 'detach'
> > or ^D^D, remove_all_break() gets called. Is there another way for gdb
> > to somehow disconnect that I don't know of?
>
> Yes. See the disconnect command in recent GDB versions.
>
> > > > - Don't try and look for a connection in put_packet, after we've
> > > > tried to put a packet. Instead, when we receive a packet, GDB has
> > > > connected.
> > >
> > > We have to check for gdb connection in putpacket or else following
> > > problem occurs.
> > >
> > > 1. kgdb console messages are to be put.
> > > 2. gdb dies
> >
> > As in doesn't cleanly remove itself?
>
> Seg faults, for instance.
That's something easily recognizable. There are worse situations where gdb has
to be killed.
GDB sometimes goes into an infinite loop of stub communications, doesn't
respond to Ctrl+C and has to be killed. It's rare, though.
-Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-01 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 21:36 [PATCH][1/3] Update CVS KGDB's serial driver Tom Rini
2004-02-25 21:43 ` [PATCH][2/3] Update CVS KGDB's have kgdb_{schedule,process}_breakpoint Tom Rini
2004-02-25 21:53 ` [PATCH][3/3] Update CVS KGDB's wrt connect / detach Tom Rini
2004-02-26 8:14 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " Amit S. Kale
2004-02-26 14:41 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-26 16:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 17:44 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-26 23:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-01 8:12 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-02-26 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-01 8:29 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-26 18:08 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-01 8:15 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-26 23:30 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26 23:59 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-27 1:57 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-27 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-27 22:11 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-27 22:50 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-01 10:18 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-01 10:17 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-27 17:13 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-27 21:55 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-01 8:36 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-01 16:31 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-25 22:59 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH][2/3] Update CVS KGDB's have kgdb_{schedule,process}_breakpoint George Anzinger
2004-02-25 23:04 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-25 23:23 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26 7:30 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-26 23:19 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-01 8:32 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-02 21:19 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-03 5:13 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-04 0:20 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-04 4:58 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-11 21:28 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-12 4:44 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-12 8:03 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-15 11:20 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-15 19:52 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-16 4:30 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-16 13:02 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-03-16 15:04 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 23:10 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH][1/3] Update CVS KGDB's serial driver George Anzinger
2004-02-25 23:18 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-26 8:25 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-26 14:43 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403011342.53980.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox