Re: [KGDB PATCH][7/7] Move debugger_entry()

["Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>]

On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 6:38 am, George Anzinger wrote:
> Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > OK to checkin.
> >
> > -Amit
> >
> > On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 3:24 am, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>Hello.  When we use kgdboe, we can't use it until do_basic_setup() is
> >> done. So we have two options, not allow kgdboe to use the initial
> >> breakpoint or move debugger_entry() to be past the point where kgdboe
> >> will be usable. I've opted for the latter, as if an earlier breakpoint
> >> is needed you can still use serial and throw
> >> kgdb_schedule_breakpoint/breakpoint where desired.
> >>
> >>--- linux-2.6.3-rc4/init/main.c	2004-02-17 09:51:19.000000000 -0700
> >>+++ linux-2.6.3-rc4-kgdb/init/main.c	2004-02-17 11:33:51.854388988 -0700
> >>@@ -581,6 +582,7 @@ static int init(void * unused)
> >>
> >> 	smp_init();
> >> 	do_basic_setup();
> >>+	debugger_entry();
>
> It would be nice to not need this.  Could it be a side effect of
> configuring the interface or some such so we don't have to patch
> init/main.c

I attempted doing this when I was trying to code a netpoll independent 
ethernet interface. I couldn't do without it. I needed one hook to kgdb in 
init to mark completion of smp_init. If an interface was ready, that hook 
called breakpoint. A similar hook was placed in interface initialization 
code, it called breakpoint, if kgdb core was ready on account of smp_init 
completion.

-Amit



> -g
>
> >> 	prepare_namespace();
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/