From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:14:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040303161415.GG4922@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8030000.1078329278@[10.10.2.4]>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:54:39AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Makes sense. But why would you want 4:4 on opteron? I'm not sure we care
> about the perf for anyone nutty enough to run a 32 bit kernel there ;-)
it would be purerly a theorical benchmark, to see if the current state
of the art technology is hurted more or less by 4:4. If it's hurted less
it's reasonable to assume newer cpus will be hurted less too. However
we'll probably deal with only with a few more generation of 32bit cpus
and it will be only from intel so I agree with you the xeon test is the
most interesting for this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 7:09 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2 Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 10:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-03 15:58 ` Dave McCracken
2004-03-03 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-03 19:04 ` Mike Kravetz
2004-03-04 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-04 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-04 16:21 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-04 17:03 ` Matt Mackall
2004-03-03 16:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 17:07 ` Dave McCracken
2004-03-03 18:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 18:44 ` Dave McCracken
2004-03-03 18:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 19:01 ` Dave McCracken
2004-03-03 21:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 21:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-03 23:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-03 15:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-03 16:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-03-25 21:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-26 11:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-03-26 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-26 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-27 14:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-27 15:29 ` Dave McCracken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040303161415.GG4922@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox