Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]

Tom Rini
2004-03-08T15:22:19Z

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:50:18PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> On Monday 08 Mar 2004 4:37 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > > If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that the
> > > dirty part is kept away and info threads almost always works.
> >
> > Yes, I'd consider `info threads' support a must-have. I'm rather surprised
> > that others do not?
>
> Present threads support code changes calling convention of do_IRQ. Most
> believe that to be an absolute no.

I believe that George's version does something totally different, with
some macros at compile time (and binutils support, I _think_) to not
have to change do_IRQ.

--
Tom Rini