From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: "Viorel Canja, Softwin" <vcanja@bitdefender.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: problem in tcp_v4_synq_add ?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:30:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040309113046.40271dc8.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <684501482.20040309132741@bitdefender.com>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:27:41 +0200
"Viorel Canja, Softwin" <vcanja@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't "write_lock(&tp->syn_wait_lock);" be moved before
> "req->dl_next = lopt->syn_table[h];" to avoid a race condition ?
Nope, the listening socket's socket lock is held, and all things that
add members to these hash chains hold that lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 11:27 problem in tcp_v4_synq_add ? Viorel Canja, Softwin
2004-03-09 19:30 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-03-10 9:04 ` Paul Wagland
2004-03-10 11:42 ` Re[2]: " Viorel Canja, Softwin
2004-03-10 21:37 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040309113046.40271dc8.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vcanja@bitdefender.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox