Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]

Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08T16:32:29Z

On Monday 08 Mar 2004 8:52 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:50:18PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > On Monday 08 Mar 2004 4:37 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that
> > > > the dirty part is kept away and info threads almost always works.
> > >
> > > Yes, I'd consider `info threads' support a must-have. I'm rather
> > > surprised that others do not?
> >
> > Present threads support code changes calling convention of do_IRQ. Most
> > believe that to be an absolute no.
>
> I believe that George's version does something totally different, with
> some macros at compile time (and binutils support, I _think_) to not
> have to change do_IRQ.

OOPS! Present code doesn't change calling convention of do_IRQ. I changed that
some time ago.

-Amit