From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262062AbUCLJuc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:50:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262070AbUCLJuc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:50:32 -0500 Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr ([213.228.0.176]:6794 "EHLO postfix4-2.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262062AbUCLJu0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:50:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:50:24 +0100 From: Romain Lievin To: Anjinsan Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: lufs removed from 2.6.4 kernel? Message-ID: <20040312095024.GA29617@lievin.net> References: <40505060.1020902@skynet.be> <20040311080906.077b9ea0.rddunlap@osdl.org> <4050A3ED.30603@skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4050A3ED.30603@skynet.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Anjinsan wrote: > Thanks for bringing up the patch question. It made me think, and after > scanning > my 2.6.3 build directory, there it was: > lufs-0.9.7-2.6.0-test9.patch > > So I guess this explain why I didn't see it in 2.6.4. My sincere apologies. There is no lufs in the kernel then ? Why ? Userland capabilities are still interesting because there is no need to modify the kernel (more reliable). Will be there anyone to merge it ? Romain. -- Romain Liévin (roms): Web site: http://www.lievin.net "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !"