From: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Marc Lehmann <pcg@schmorp.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: strange ext3 corruption problem on 2.6.x
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:40:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040313024057.GA2207@buici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312183423.71d7bbb9.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 06:34:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Marc Lehmann <pcg@schmorp.de> wrote:
> >
> > I use lvm-over-raid5 and get these messages once a day (requiring a reboot
> > afterwards):
> >
> > EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #4804801: directory entry across blocks - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=50000,
> > name_len=152
> > Aborting journal on device dm-0.
>
> (and fsck comes up clean)
>
> There have been earlier reports of this. Too many for it to be some random
> glitch. We've had similar reports in 2.4, usually with raid5.
>
> I'm fairly confident in ext3 - it's hard to think of an ext3-level bug
> which wouldn't have 10x as many reports from non-md users. But perhaps
> some timing unique to the MD layer is triggering some ext3 bug.
>
> Joe, Neil: have you spotted reports like this? Any suggestions as to how
> to track it down a bit?
I, too, have been experiencing this with ext3 on top of lvm on top of
raid5. I also have a dual-proc machine.
It seems to be some sort of race condition because it is triggered by
multiple disk-io intensive processes using the same volume. Many
mornings, when I first login to this machine which runs all of the
time, I find that one or more of the volumes is mounted read-only.
Sometimes e2fsck shows errors and sometimes it doesn't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-13 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-13 0:47 strange ext3 corruption problem on 2.6.x Marc Lehmann
2004-03-13 2:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-13 2:40 ` Marc Singer [this message]
[not found] <20040314222929.GA23106@mark>
2004-03-15 3:41 ` Marc Lehmann
2004-03-18 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <1zRh6-2V6-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1zRh6-2V6-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-15 23:25 ` Thorild Selen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-23 7:33 John Pearson
2004-03-23 7:54 ` Andrew D Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040313024057.GA2207@buici.com \
--to=elf@buici.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=pcg@schmorp.de \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox