From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dealing with swsusp vs. pmdisk
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:19:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040313221939.GG5960@luna.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040313123620.GA3352@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:36:21PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Pavel, what do you think of the swsusp2 patch, BTW? My biggest
> > > complaint about it is that since it's maintained outside of the
> > > kernel, it's constantly behind about 0.75 revisions behind the latest
> > > 2.6 release. The feature set of swsusp2, if they can ever get it
> > > completely bugfree(tm) is certainly impressive.
> >
> > I'd like it to be merged upstream too.
>
> Are we talking 2.6 or 2.7 here?
That would probably depend on which one is more stable, not only
features. AFAIK swsusp2 is quite stable barring problems with drivers
with faulty PM code (dri, usb, ...). What is the state of swsusp?
> --
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-13 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 22:46 Dealing with swsusp vs. pmdisk Pavel Machek
2004-03-13 0:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-13 2:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-13 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-13 22:19 ` Micha Feigin [this message]
2004-03-14 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-14 0:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-15 20:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-15 23:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16 1:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-03-15 23:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-16 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-13 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-15 23:17 ` Jan Rychter
2004-03-16 18:16 ` Kevin Fenzi, Kevin Fenzi
2004-03-18 10:21 ` Jan Rychter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040313221939.GG5960@luna.mooo.com \
--to=michf@post.tau.ac.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox