Re: [ACPI] X86_PM_TIMER: /proc/cpuinfo doesn't get updated

Nate Lawson
2004-03-17T22:56:30Z

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:40:57PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 March 2004 08:33 pm, Peter Chubb wrote:
> > > >>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> writes:
> > >
> > > Dmitry> On Tuesday 16 March 2004 07:13 pm, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> > > >> Thus wrote john stultz: > Hmm. This is untested, but I think this
> > > >> should do the trick.
> > > >>
> > > >> Hmm... without the patch, neither cpu MHz nor bogomips are updated,
> > > >> with the patch cpu MHz value seems correct (both using acpi.ko and
> > > >> speedstep-ich.ko, but the bogomips is still at its initial value.
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Dmitry> Karol, do you have a P4? AFAIK P4's TSC is stable even if core
> > > Dmitry> frequence changes so loop_per_juffy (== bogomips) need not be
> > > Dmitry> updated.
> > >
> > > The TSC is variable rate for Pentium-IV if you're using clock
> > > modulation.
> > >
> > > Peter C
> > >
> >
> > I understand that by clock modulation you mean throttling as opposed to
> > true SpeedStep... OK, that means that for P4+ we somehow need to figure
> > out whether the CPU is throttled or not to correctly calculate delays.
> > Is there a clean way to get this data?
>
> Hm, will have one patch to test it ready later today -- and a basic patch to
> do this distinction is in the hiding of my notebook's harddisk already...
> who's willing to do some testing on his SpeedStep-capable Pentium 4 - Mobile.

Instead of all this gymnastics, how about:

1. If using Px states, state is unknown until first "set" event.

2. Implement priorities for time source selection and a generic timer API.
This gets around the need to get the clock rate correct to have system
timers work. On FreeBSD, this is /sys/kern/kern_tc.c

-Nate