From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262026AbUCQUfx (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:35:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262052AbUCQUfw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:35:52 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:19328 "EHLO midnight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262026AbUCQUfq (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:35:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:36:58 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: pingc@wacom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wacom USB driver patch Message-ID: <20040317203658.GA369@ucw.cz> References: <20040317092959.5e00fab4.zaitcev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317092959.5e00fab4.zaitcev@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Dear Ping, > > Vojtech posted your 2.6 patch to linux-kernel yesterday, so I examined it > (Subject: [PATCH 32/44] Update of Wacom driver from Ping Cheng (from Wacom)). > Unlike the 2.4 version, it does not feature a reset thread. Please tell > me why that thread was required in 2.4. > > Or perhaps it was present in your original submission which I lost and > Vojtech removed that element of the patch? I didn't remove it - it was not present in the 2.6 patch. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR