From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: floppy driver 2.6.3 question
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040318122831.GO22234@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403181223.i2ICNkE13506@oboe.it.uc3m.es>
On Thu, Mar 18 2004, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > > know. 128 requests have just previously been errored due to readahead
> > > and the check_media_changed result setting the driver request function
> > > to error out requests. Perhaps we have run out of requests (they're
> > > all put_ as far as I can see). Maybe the block layers get tired of
> > > talking to a device that errors requests. I'm just feeling my way!
> > > Any wild ideas are welcome!
> >
> > If the 129th request fails, then that's a pretty good clue that you
> > aren't getting the requests freed. Perhaps you are overwriting something
> > in the request after allocating it? Always mask change ->flags (don't
> > just set it), and don't overwrite ->rl.
>
> Good idea. rl is inviolate, but I set at least |=REQ_NOMERGE sometimes
> on flags. And I pass ioctl information in fake requests by setting
May I ask on what commands you set that bit?
> the bit just beyond the edge of those currently used (__REQ_BITS) to
> indicate its an ioctl and treating it specially in end request. Maybe
> on error I forgot to remove the extra bit before doing put_blk_request
Ugh, that sounds like very bad practice... The 'standard' way of doing
something like that is to flag REQ_SPECIAL and put whatever structure
you want in ->special.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 20:02 floppy driver 2.6.3 question Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 8:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 9:10 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 10:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 11:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 12:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 12:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-03-18 13:25 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 13:31 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 16:06 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 16:16 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 18:11 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040318122831.GO22234@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox