From: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>
To: ross@datscreative.com.au
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>,
len.brown@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:55:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403191955.38059.thomas.schlichter@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403181019.02636.ross@datscreative.com.au>
Am Donnerstag, 18. März 2004 01:19 schrieb Ross Dickson:
~~ snip ~~
> > The only way to cool down my CPU was to enable timer_ack.
> > I don't know how to help you, but of course I am willing to test
> > patches... ;-) Thomas
>
> I agree with Len Brown's comments to try to examine which power saving
> state but if you want to try to brute force C1 state ( only works if
> chipset supported ) you could try this patch for process.c,
> (ignore the io-apic patch as it is nforce2 specific).
>
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-02/6520.html
> The KERNEL ARG to invoke it is "idle=C1halt".
>
> It has an extra function pointer to prevent the power management idle
> routine hikjacking things after the command line arg has requested an idle
> routine.
>
> These idle mods appear to assist more than just nforce2 Athlon boards.
> Thomas Herrmann has had success with an SIS740
>
> > Hi Ross,
> > I just want to let you know that your nforce2_idle patch does work with
> > the SiS740 chipset too. While the current ACPI patch already routes the
> > timer of the SiS740 to IO-APIC-edge with out the C1halt option of your
> > nforce2_idle patch the system locked up when STPGNT was enabled. But
> > after I applied your nforce2_idle patch to kernel 2.4.24 together with
> > the C1halt kernel boot option, the system runs stable for hours.
> > Great work, thanks!
> > Best regards, Thomas
>
> Craig Bradney has put it into the gentoo dev sources also.
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-03/1746.html
OK, now I had the time to test if different C states are working with
following three kernels:
1. 2.6.4-mm2 without the 8259-timer-ack-fix.patch and without the C1halt idle
function.
2. 2.6.4-mm2 with the 8259-timer-ack-fix.patch and without the C1 halt idle
function enabled.
3. 2.6.4-mm2 with the 8259-timer-ack-fix.patch and with the C1 halt idle
function enabled.
I used following script to print the C-state counters on an complete idle
machine before and after a 10second interval:
# /bin/sh
cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power
sleep 10
cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power
Now the results:
1.:
active state: C2
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00006280]
*C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00300041]
C3: <not supported>
active state: C2
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00006300]
*C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00310045]
C3: <not supported>
2.:
active state: C1
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
*C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00000000]
C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00000000]
C3: <not supported>
active state: C1
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
*C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00000000]
C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00000000]
C3: <not supported>
3.:
active state: C1
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
*C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00000000]
C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00000000]
C3: <not supported>
active state: C1
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
*C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000]
usage[00000000]
C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[100]
usage[00000000]
C3: <not supported>
So, as you can see, the C1halt patch does not help here... ;-(
Regards
Thomas Schlichter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 0:19 idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1 Ross Dickson
2004-03-18 1:02 ` Craig Bradney
2004-03-18 11:41 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-03-18 11:55 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-19 18:55 ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2004-03-19 19:22 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-19 23:20 ` Len Brown
2004-03-20 9:29 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:19 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-20 10:25 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:50 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-29 19:59 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-30 0:57 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-30 9:30 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 13:07 ` Daniel Egger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-17 21:26 Thomas Schlichter
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F571D@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-03-17 15:53 ` Len Brown
[not found] <200403032119.58817.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2004-03-17 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-04 12:47 Thomas Schlichter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403191955.38059.thomas.schlichter@web.de \
--to=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=ross@datscreative.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox