From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
mjy@geizhals.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:09:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040320150956.GE2045@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040320150311.GN9009@dualathlon.random>
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:51:11AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I may have missed one of his posts where he gave the results from the
>> RT test suite. I found a list of functions with some kind of numbers,
>> though I didn't see a description of what those numbers were and was
>> looking for something more detailed (e.g. the output of the RT
>> instrumentation things he had with and without preempt). This is all
>> mostly curiosity and sort of hoping this gets carried out vaguely
>> scientifically anyway, so I'm not really arguing one way or the other.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:03:11PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> agreed. what I've seen so far is a great number of graphs, they were
> scientific enough for my needs and covering real life different
> workloads, but I'm not sure what Takashi published exactly, you may want
> to discuss it with him.
I didn't see the graphs; they may be helpful for my purposes.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-20 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 4:00 CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads Marinos J. Yannikos
2004-03-18 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 6:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 9:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 14:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 15:34 ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 16:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 17:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 17:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 18:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 18:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 17:48 ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 10:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-19 2:17 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20040319050948.GN2045@holomorphy.com>
2004-03-20 12:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 14:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-20 15:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 15:09 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-03-24 13:57 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-24 14:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 15:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-18 15:20 ` Tom Sightler
2004-03-18 15:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 23:54 ` Tom Sightler
2004-03-18 15:39 ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 15:28 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 15:40 ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 15:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:08 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:20 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 19:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:24 ` Robert Love
2004-03-19 22:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-19 22:12 ` Robert Love
2004-03-24 15:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:48 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-19 11:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 13:46 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-19 14:06 ` Takashi Iwai
[not found] ` <20040318221006.74246648.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-03-19 10:30 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-23 9:14 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-19 17:22 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-19 18:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-20 12:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 13:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-18 19:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 22:54 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-18 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 20:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 3:07 ` Eric St-Laurent
2004-03-19 11:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 13:35 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040320150956.GE2045@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjy@geizhals.at \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox