public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2.6.5-rc2] CAN-2004-0075 still valid for 2.6?
@ 2004-03-20 19:59 Marc-Christian Petersen
  2004-03-20 20:16 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2004-03-20 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lkml; +Cc: linux-usb-users, Greg Kroah-Hartman

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

seems $subject is still valid for 2.6, no? - 2.4 got a fix 11 weeks ago.

See this: 
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/drivers/usb/vicam.c@1.15?nav=index.html|
src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/usb|hist/drivers/usb/vicam.c

Please apply.

ciao, Marc

[-- Attachment #2: CAN-2004-0075-usb-vicam.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 840 bytes --]

# drivers/usb/media/vicam.c |   13 ++++++++++---
# 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -urN linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c
--- linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2003-11-28 10:26:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2004-01-15 12:10:23.000000000 -0800
@@ -653,12 +653,19 @@
 	case VIDIOCSWIN:
 		{
 
-			struct video_window *vw = (struct video_window *) arg;
-			DBG("VIDIOCSWIN %d x %d\n", vw->width, vw->height);
+			struct video_window vw;
 
-			if ( vw->width != 320 || vw->height != 240 )
+			if (copy_from_user(&vw, arg, sizeof(vw)))
+			{
 				retval = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
+
+			DBG("VIDIOCSWIN %d x %d\n", vw->width, vw->height);
 			
+			if ( vw.width != 320 || vw.height != 240 )
+				retval = -EFAULT;
+
 			break;
 		}
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.5-rc2] CAN-2004-0075 still valid for 2.6?
  2004-03-20 19:59 [PATCH 2.6.5-rc2] CAN-2004-0075 still valid for 2.6? Marc-Christian Petersen
@ 2004-03-20 20:16 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-03-20 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc-Christian Petersen; +Cc: lkml, linux-usb-users

On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:59:33PM +0100, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> seems $subject is still valid for 2.6, no? - 2.4 got a fix 11 weeks ago.
> 
> See this: 
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/drivers/usb/vicam.c@1.15?nav=index.html|
> src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/usb|hist/drivers/usb/vicam.c
> 
> Please apply.
> 
> ciao, Marc

> # drivers/usb/media/vicam.c |   13 ++++++++++---
> # 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -urN linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c
> --- linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2003-11-28 10:26:20.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2004-01-15 12:10:23.000000000 -0800
> @@ -653,12 +653,19 @@
>  	case VIDIOCSWIN:
>  		{
>  
> -			struct video_window *vw = (struct video_window *) arg;
> -			DBG("VIDIOCSWIN %d x %d\n", vw->width, vw->height);
> +			struct video_window vw;
>  
> -			if ( vw->width != 320 || vw->height != 240 )
> +			if (copy_from_user(&vw, arg, sizeof(vw)))
> +			{

Care to implement proper coding style here?

And for some reason I thought this was already fixed in 2.6...  guess
not.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-20 20:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-20 19:59 [PATCH 2.6.5-rc2] CAN-2004-0075 still valid for 2.6? Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-03-20 20:16 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox