From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched_setaffinity usability
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:51:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040321095116.GA7721@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405AB72B.4030204@aitel.hist.no>
* Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
> Let the compile create that info file. Then handle it much like a
> module, except that it is a "module" without any code. I.e. copy it
> to /lib/modules/<kernelversion> if installing modules, or stuff the
> file into the initrd if making an initrd.
>
> Now it is in a place specific to the kernel, where a library can find
> it.
this has a couple of disadvantages:
- the kernel can pre-map the 'file' cheaper - in fact on x86 it's
zero-cost currently. Mapping a file takes 3 syscalls and at least one
pagefault. Since glibc needs a good portion of this info for
absolutely every ELF binary, why not provide it in a preconstructed
way? x86 is doing it via the VDSO. ia64 and x86-64 is doing it via a
dso-alike mechanism.
- obtaining the kernel version currently needs one more syscall
[uname()].
- the 'metadata' becomes detached from the kernel image, so it
cannot contain 'crutial' data. Testing kernels becomes harder, etc.
(until now i could just send a bzImage to someone to get it tested -
now it would have to include the metadata too.)
- it excludes non-build-time data.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-21 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 8:05 sched_setaffinity usability Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18 8:12 ` Tim Hockin
2004-03-18 8:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18 8:47 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18 9:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 10:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 12:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-18 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-19 8:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-18 18:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 18:33 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 18:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 20:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 20:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 20:49 ` David Lang
2004-03-18 20:57 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-18 21:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 21:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-18 21:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-19 1:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-19 9:02 ` Helge Hafting
2004-03-21 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-03-19 0:00 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-18 17:47 ` sched_setaffinity usability -- other issue Chris Friesen
[not found] <1B0Ls-lY-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1B42z-3Lx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1B4Fh-4sQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1B86P-8gq-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1Bars-2s6-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1BaKU-2Lg-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1BaKX-2Lg-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1BaUR-2V0-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-18 21:23 ` sched_setaffinity usability Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040321095116.GA7721@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox