From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mbligh@aracnet.com, akpm@osdl.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7]
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:13:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040323031345.GY2045@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040322183918.5e0f17c7.pj@sgi.com>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 06:39:18PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> From this I conjecture that I can provide a single call:
> cpumask_and(cpumask_t d, cpumask_t s1, cpumask_t s2);
> that works on both normal (1 to 32 cpu) systems and on big iron systems,
> with traditional 'C' pass by value semantics, all derived from a single
> mask type that works for both node and cpu masks.
> The one sticky point evident to me so far would be if some generic code
> were passing a cpumask_t across a function call boundary, and needed to
> be optimum for both small and sparc64 - one would want to pass by value,
> the other would want to pass a pointer to the cpumask.
> This is not your fathers 'C'. The compile time inlining and
> optimization provided by gcc enables it to do a lot more than Dennis
> Ritchie's original C compiler that I learned on.
gcc flat out miscompiled such inlines last I checked (Zwane shipped the
bugreport IIRC). Either this kind of good behavior is not universally
observable or a miracle occurred and gcc's codegen went from incorrect
to 1980's (fscking patents).
Anyhow, this was also an observation of the code effectively made in
isolation; uninlining and other catastrophes do happen.
If people really thinks this works and/or don't care when it doesn't,
go for it. Last time I heard they did; who knows, the answer may be
different this time.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-23 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 23:04 [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7] Matthew Dobson
2004-03-18 23:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-18 23:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-18 23:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-18 23:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-18 23:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-19 16:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-19 0:58 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-19 1:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-19 1:34 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-19 1:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-19 1:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 0:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-18 23:58 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-19 2:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-19 0:59 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 1:19 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-19 1:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 22:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-19 23:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 1:48 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 1:56 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 23:02 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-20 0:59 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-20 3:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-20 6:09 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-20 9:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-22 23:59 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-23 2:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-23 1:21 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-23 2:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-23 1:24 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-20 8:02 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-20 11:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-21 4:19 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-21 4:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-21 7:59 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-23 1:12 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-23 2:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-23 2:39 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-23 3:13 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-03-23 3:36 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-23 3:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-23 4:03 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <20040325012457.51f708c7.pj@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20040325101827.GO791@holomorphy.com>
2004-03-26 22:36 ` Sparc64, cpumask_t and struct arguments (was: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT) Paul Jackson
2004-03-26 22:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-26 23:18 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-26 23:29 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-27 0:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-27 0:50 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-26 23:37 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] <1BeOx-7ax-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1BgGq-DU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1BgZN-Vk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-19 2:04 ` [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7] Andi Kleen
2004-03-19 2:38 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-19 23:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-20 0:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-20 1:14 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040323031345.GY2045@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox