From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.3 Posix scheduling violation for !SCHED_OTHER
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 01:01:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040324000121.GA2321@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040323233554.GA24010@tsunami.ccur.com>
* Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com> wrote:
> Andrew,
> The following fixes a problem where a SCHED_FIFO task would on
> occasion be moved to the end of its runqueue when returned to from a
> preemption. Cause was do to some SCHED_OTHER code in schedule() which
> was being run for tasks of every policy.
yes, indeed this is a bug.
> - if (next->activated > 0) {
> + if (!rt_task(next) && next->activated > 0) {
the patch looks good. Andrew, please apply.
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-23 23:35 [PATCH] 2.6.3 Posix scheduling violation for !SCHED_OTHER Joe Korty
2004-03-24 0:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040324000121.GA2321@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox