From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
To: Suspend development list <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:21:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040327022125.GA2174@luna.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040325222745.GE2179@elf.ucw.cz>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:27:45PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > By the way, here's an example where having the /proc interface is a good
> > thing: which do you use? zip compression, lzf compression or no
> > compression? Until recently I always used lzf compression. I just
>
> We should select one, and drop the others.
>
> gzip is useless for almost everyone -> gets little testing -> is
> probably broken.
>
> > upgraded my laptop's hard drive, and found I wasn't getting the
> > performance improvements in suspending I expected. It turns out that the
> > CPU is now the limiting factor. Because I had the /proc interface, I
> > could easily adjust the debug settings to show me throughput and then
> > try a couple of suspend cycles with compression enabled and with it
> > disabled. Without the /proc interface, I would have had to have
> > recompiled the kernel to switch settings. (I didn't try gzip because I
> > knew it wasn't going to be a contender for me).
>
> Kernel could automagically select the right one.. But I'd prefer for
> only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze
That would mean that most people around would want to patch their
kernel considering the speed increase and the saved space (which
converts to needing less swap) considering most people get 30%-50%
compression rate, which translates to quite a bit with laptops with 1G
ram being no too uncommon these days.
You shouldn't be to extreme in you eagerness to trim things. You should
always take in mind what would be good for the user, not only the
developer.
> was few months ago, and "adding possibility to compress swsusp data"
> does not sound like a bugfix to me...
> Pavel
> --
> When do you have a heart between your knees?
> [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> swsusp-devel mailing list
> swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swsusp-devel
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-27 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1079659165.15559.34.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318193703.4c02f7f5.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079661410.15557.38.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318200513.287ebcf0.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079664318.15559.41.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
2004-03-21 22:00 ` swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 0:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 20:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-22 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 9:53 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-23 15:25 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-23 21:47 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 21:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:07 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-23 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:45 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-23 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 0:05 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-03-23 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-23 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 3:12 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:46 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 23:56 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:23 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:50 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 1:41 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net>
2004-03-25 20:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 13:17 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-27 14:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-29 12:10 ` fast compressed fs (was Re: -nice tree) Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 20:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-26 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-27 2:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-27 3:37 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 4:28 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 4:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 19:50 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 20:03 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:01 ` Paranoia is fun [Was Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]] Michael Frank
2004-03-27 21:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:29 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-28 0:27 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 2:21 ` Micha Feigin [this message]
2004-03-29 12:13 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 4:52 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 5:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 6:22 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 5:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 7:31 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:06 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 9:32 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 14:15 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:35 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 5:06 ` sleeping in request function mohanlal jangir
[not found] ` <20040324083313.GG3377@suse.de>
2004-03-25 3:45 ` mohanlal jangir
2004-03-24 10:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 12:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 15:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 20:22 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 21:06 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:13 ` swsusp is not reliable. Face it. [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 10:21 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:08 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:05 ` Markus Gaugusch
2004-03-24 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040327022125.GA2174@luna.mooo.com \
--to=michf@post.tau.ac.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox