From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
To: swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:50:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040327195009.GA2737@luna.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403270440.47737.luke-jr@artcena.com>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:40:47AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 04:28 am, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > Actually it would be very unlikely that grabbing the hard disk would
> > enable to boot on another machine since you are restoring all the
> > context/modules etc. The grabber would need an identical system, and
> > even then I doubt it would work (I don't know how flexible linux and
> > the hardware are in this respect.
> But a different system *could* be used to analyze the content of the partition
> were it stolen.
It could be relevant so that you can access the resume data only on the
same computer so that access to encrypted partitions couldn't be gained
by looking at the suspend data, but I don't know how encrypted
partitions work, so can't say anything about that.
> >
> > Its more a question of grabbing you entire computer and getting access
> > to you hard disk, including encrypted partitions. In this case you
> > would want to request a key from the user and not use a hardware
> > related key.
> hardware-related is probably better than an argument, at least.
If the key is given at resume command line and this is properly
forgotten when the resumed kernel kicks in then a user key will also
probably be ok.
It wouldn't do much good getting a safer method then the way the
encrypted partition works in the first place.
I think the difference would be user convenience more then security.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> swsusp-devel mailing list
> swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swsusp-devel
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-27 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1079659165.15559.34.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318193703.4c02f7f5.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079661410.15557.38.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318200513.287ebcf0.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079664318.15559.41.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
2004-03-21 22:00 ` swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 0:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 20:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-22 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 9:53 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-23 15:25 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-23 21:47 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 21:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:07 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-23 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:45 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-23 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 0:05 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-03-23 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-23 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 3:12 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:46 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 23:56 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:23 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:50 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 1:41 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net>
2004-03-25 20:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 13:17 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-27 14:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-29 12:10 ` fast compressed fs (was Re: -nice tree) Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 20:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-26 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-27 2:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-27 3:37 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 4:28 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 4:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 19:50 ` Micha Feigin [this message]
2004-03-27 20:03 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:01 ` Paranoia is fun [Was Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]] Michael Frank
2004-03-27 21:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:29 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-28 0:27 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 2:21 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-29 12:13 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 4:52 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 5:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 6:22 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 5:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 7:31 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:06 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 9:32 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 14:15 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:35 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 5:06 ` sleeping in request function mohanlal jangir
[not found] ` <20040324083313.GG3377@suse.de>
2004-03-25 3:45 ` mohanlal jangir
2004-03-24 10:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 12:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 15:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 20:22 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 21:06 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:13 ` swsusp is not reliable. Face it. [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 10:21 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:08 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:05 ` Markus Gaugusch
2004-03-24 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040327195009.GA2737@luna.mooo.com \
--to=michf@post.tau.ac.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox