public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
To: swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was	Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:27:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040328002705.GA6634@luna.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040327212946.GB295@elf.ucw.cz>

On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:29:46PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On So 27-03-04 03:37:48, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 March 2004 02:08 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 10:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > You are right, that would be ugly. How is encryption supposed to work,
> > > > kernel asks you to type in a key?
> > >
> > > I haven't thought about the specifics there. Perhaps the plugin prompts
> > > for one, or perhaps it takes a lilo parameter? 
> > The only purpose I can think of for encryption would be so someone can't grab 
> > the HD and boot it on another PC or read the image directly.
> > Unless I'm missing something, that would imply that the key would need to be 
> > generated from a hardware profile (only creatable by root) somehow to 
> > restrict its readability to that one system.
> 
> Hmm, I do not see how hardware hash helps. When I can steal your hdd,
> there's good chance I can steal whole machine, too.
> 								Pavel

Which is probably much more probable. I have to admit I haven't heard
much of hard disk theft, but quite a bit of laptop theft, and when
swsusp comes to mind in this respect I would think the laptop thingy is
more of a problem.

> -- 
> When do you have a heart between your knees?
> [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> swsusp-devel mailing list
> swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swsusp-devel
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-28  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1079659165.15559.34.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
     [not found] ` <20040318193703.4c02f7f5.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]   ` <1079661410.15557.38.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
     [not found]     ` <20040318200513.287ebcf0.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]       ` <1079664318.15559.41.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
2004-03-21 22:00         ` swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-22  0:29           ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 20:55           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-22 23:17             ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23  9:53               ` [Swsusp-devel] " Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-23 15:25                 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-23 21:47                 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 21:08                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:17                     ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:38                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:07                     ` Michael Frank
2004-03-23 23:17                       ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:36                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:45                           ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-23 22:52                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24  0:05                               ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-03-23 23:10                                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:43                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-23 23:32                     ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:40                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:44                         ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24  3:12                           ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:17                             ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:46                               ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 23:23                                 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 23:56                                   ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25  0:23                                     ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25  0:50                                       ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25  1:41                                         ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]                                           ` <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net>
2004-03-25 20:39                                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:27                                               ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:38                                                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:54                                                   ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26  5:59                                                     ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:50                                                       ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 13:17                                                         ` Michael Frank
2004-03-27 14:49                                                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-29 12:10                                                     ` fast compressed fs (was Re: -nice tree) Pavel Machek
2004-03-26  5:59                                                 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:22                                                   ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 20:30                                                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-26 22:22                                                       ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-27  2:08                                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-27  3:37                                                           ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27  4:28                                                             ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27  4:40                                                               ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 19:50                                                                 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 20:03                                                                   ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:01                                                                     ` Paranoia is fun [Was Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]] Michael Frank
2004-03-27 21:40                                                                       ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:29                                                             ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-28  0:27                                                               ` Micha Feigin [this message]
2004-03-27  2:21                                                 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-29 12:13                                                   ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24  4:52                       ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24  5:04                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24  6:22                           ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24  5:46                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24  7:31                               ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:26                                 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25  0:06                                   ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24  9:32                             ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 14:15                               ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25  0:35                                 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24  5:06                         ` sleeping in request function mohanlal jangir
     [not found]                           ` <20040324083313.GG3377@suse.de>
2004-03-25  3:45                             ` mohanlal jangir
2004-03-24 10:22                         ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 12:48                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 15:18                             ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 20:22                               ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 21:06                                 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:13                                   ` swsusp is not reliable. Face it. [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:33                                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:52                                       ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26  5:59                                     ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26  9:59                                       ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 10:21                                         ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:08                                 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:05                           ` Markus Gaugusch
2004-03-24 21:25                             ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040328002705.GA6634@luna.mooo.com \
    --to=michf@post.tau.ac.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox