* RE: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue
[not found] <200403260930.59284.efocht@hpce.nec.com>
@ 2004-03-28 10:06 ` shai
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: shai @ 2004-03-28 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andrew Morton'
Cc: ricklind, mbligh, lse-tech, 'Erik Jacobson',
'Erich Focht', 'Paul Jackson',
'Xavier Bru', linux-kernel
Hi,
Very nice patch.
Andrew, would you consider adding this one?
--Shai
-----Original Message-----
From: lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Erich Focht
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 00:31
To: Paul Jackson; Xavier Bru
Cc: ricklind@us.ibm.com; mbligh@aracnet.com; lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net;
Erik Jacobson
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 20:03, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Where are you getting the printouts that look like:
>
> initial CPU = 2
> cpu 18491 16
> cpu0 17125 2
> cpu1 441 0
> cpu2 700 14
> cpu3 225 0
> ...
> current_cpu 0
>
> We have something in our SGI 2.4 kernels (/proc/<pid>/cpu) that
> displays this sort of per-cpu usage, but I don't see anything
> in the 2.6 kernels that seems to do this.
its probably the attached patch. Sorry, I'm travelling and couldn't
rediff against a current version...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-28 10:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200403260930.59284.efocht@hpce.nec.com>
2004-03-28 10:06 ` [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue shai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox