From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262073AbUCaQ5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:57:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262080AbUCaQ5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:57:13 -0500 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:39572 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262073AbUCaQ5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:57:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:56:56 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Rusty Russell Cc: Dirk Morris , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.2] Badness in futex_wait revisited Message-ID: <20040331165656.GG19280@mail.shareable.org> References: <40311703.8070309@metavize.com> <20040217051911.6AC112C066@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040217051911.6AC112C066@lists.samba.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Was the badness in futex_wait problem ever resolved? -- Jamie