Re: [Patch 17/23] mask v2 = [6/7] nodemask_t_ia64_changes

Paul Jackson
2004-04-07T14:46:59Z

Nick wrote:
> No, the schedule() fastpath doesn't use find_next_bit.

Ok - makes sense - thanks.

Uninlining it is perhaps the easiest way out.

That or replacing it with the trivial version that is several times
smaller (loops one bit at a time, checking 'test_bit()').

Right now, I don't see any excuse for that fat version of find_next_bit()
to exist.