From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:37:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040401163715.3592cedc.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040401220957.5f4f9ad2.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> he solution from back then I actually liked best was to just round
> up to the next second instead of rounding down when going from 1s
> resolution to ns.
>
> -Andi
>
> e.g. like this for ext3 (untested). Does that fix your problem?
>
> diff -u linux-2.6.5rc3-work/fs/ext3/inode.c-o linux-2.6.5rc3-work/fs/ext3/inode.c
> --- linux-2.6.5rc3-work/fs/ext3/inode.c-o 2004-04-01 22:07:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.5rc3-work/fs/ext3/inode.c 2004-04-01 22:08:49.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2624,9 +2624,11 @@
> }
> raw_inode->i_links_count = cpu_to_le16(inode->i_nlink);
> raw_inode->i_size = cpu_to_le32(ei->i_disksize);
> - raw_inode->i_atime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_atime.tv_sec);
> - raw_inode->i_ctime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ctime.tv_sec);
> - raw_inode->i_mtime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mtime.tv_sec);
> + /* round up because we cannot store nanoseconds. This avoids
> + the time jumping back when the inode is loaded again. */
> + raw_inode->i_atime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_atime.tv_sec + 1);
> + raw_inode->i_ctime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ctime.tv_sec + 1);
> + raw_inode->i_mtime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mtime.tv_sec + 1);
> raw_inode->i_blocks = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_blocks);
> raw_inode->i_dtime = cpu_to_le32(ei->i_dtime);
> raw_inode->i_flags = cpu_to_le32(ei->i_flags);
I think this will cause the inode timestamps to keep on creeping forwards.
How about in ext3_read_inode() you do:
inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
- inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 0;
+ inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 999999999;
?
It still has problems, but I think they're smaller ones.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 19:28 Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 20:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-01 20:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 21:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 21:44 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 22:39 ` Joe Buck
2004-04-01 22:44 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-01 22:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 23:58 ` Joe Buck
2004-04-02 0:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-02 0:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 0:35 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 1:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 7:57 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2004-04-02 9:22 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 16:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 20:45 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 21:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 21:56 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-03 4:59 ` Andrew Pimlott
2004-04-02 0:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-06-07 16:03 ` Jörn Engel
2004-04-01 21:13 ` Janis Johnson
2004-04-01 21:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-02 0:30 ` Alan Modra
2004-04-02 9:05 ` P
2004-04-02 17:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-01 20:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040401163715.3592cedc.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox