* HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@ 2004-03-30 21:40 Dupuis, Chad
2004-04-02 12:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dupuis, Chad @ 2004-03-30 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I wanted to report that the
{"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_NOSTARTONADD},
entry in the device_list[] structure in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c is
incorrect. It should be
{"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_NOSTARTONADD}
Thank you,
Chad Dupuis
Hewlett-Packard Company
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
2004-03-30 21:40 HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Dupuis, Chad
@ 2004-04-02 12:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2004-04-02 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dupuis, Chad; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-kernel
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:40:00PM -0500, Dupuis, Chad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to report that the
>
> {"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_NOSTARTONADD},
>
> entry in the device_list[] structure in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c is
> incorrect. It should be
>
> {"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN |
> BLIST_NOSTARTONADD}
Hi Chad,
Mind to write a patch for 2.6 and, as soon as its tested there, we can
backport it to 2.4.
James should handle this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@ 2004-04-02 14:47 Dupuis, Chad
2004-04-02 16:39 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dupuis, Chad @ 2004-04-02 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-kernel
Ok, thank you.
Regards,
Chad Dupuis
Hewlett-Packard Company
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:37 AM
To: Dupuis, Chad
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:40:00PM -0500, Dupuis, Chad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to report that the
>
> {"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_NOSTARTONADD},
>
> entry in the device_list[] structure in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c is
> incorrect. It should be
>
> {"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN |
> BLIST_NOSTARTONADD}
Hi Chad,
Mind to write a patch for 2.6 and, as soon as its tested there, we can
backport it to 2.4.
James should handle this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* RE: HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
2004-04-02 14:47 Dupuis, Chad
@ 2004-04-02 16:39 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2004-04-02 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dupuis, Chad; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Linux Kernel
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 09:47, Dupuis, Chad wrote:
> Ok, thank you.
For 2.6, can you first of all verify that the HSG80 won't work without
the BLIST_FORCELUN removed and CONFIG_SCSI_REPORT_LUNS enabled? (If I
remember, this is a pretty old array, so probably won't, but just make
sure).
Thanks,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-02 16:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-30 21:40 HSG80 entry in drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Dupuis, Chad
2004-04-02 12:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-02 14:47 Dupuis, Chad
2004-04-02 16:39 ` James Bottomley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox