* elevators
@ 2004-04-02 22:57 Fabian Frederick
2004-04-02 23:37 ` elevators Marc-Christian Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Frederick @ 2004-04-02 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I've been testing cfq against standard elevator under
2.6.5rc3-mm4 with dbench and I've been surprised by high variations
there.Someone could tell me if there are a lot of elevator patches
available to compare ?
PS:I'm not subscribed to lkml.
Regards,
Fabian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: elevators
2004-04-02 22:57 elevators Fabian Frederick
@ 2004-04-02 23:37 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc-Christian Petersen @ 2004-04-02 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Fabian Frederick
On Saturday 03 April 2004 00:57, Fabian Frederick wrote:
Hi Fabian,
> I've been testing cfq against standard elevator under
> 2.6.5rc3-mm4 with dbench and I've been surprised by high variations
> there.Someone could tell me if there are a lot of elevator patches
> available to compare ?
less Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
...
elevator= [IOSCHED]
Format: {"as"|"cfq"|"deadline"|"noop"}
See Documentation/as-iosched.txt for details
imho there are no more elevator patches out there.
ciao, Marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-02 23:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-02 22:57 elevators Fabian Frederick
2004-04-02 23:37 ` elevators Marc-Christian Petersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox