From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262273AbUDDJMr (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 05:12:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262274AbUDDJMr (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 05:12:47 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:54290 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262273AbUDDJMq (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 05:12:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 10:12:41 +0100 From: Russell King To: Linux Kernel List , Ralf Baechle Subject: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping? Message-ID: <20040404101241.A10158@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , Ralf Baechle Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Since we have drivers/serial/dz.[ch] now merged, is there a reason to keep drivers/char/dz.[ch] around any more? I notice people keep doing cleanups, but this is wasted effort if the driver is superseded by the new drivers/serial/dz.[ch] driver. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core