The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Eric Whiting <ewhiting@amis.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact]
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 02:18:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040408001845.GX26888@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33900000.1081380891@flay>

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:34:51PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I measured it - IIRC it was 5-10% on kernel compile ... and that was on a
> high ratio NUMA which it should have made *better* (as with highmem, the
> PTEs can be allocated node locally). I'll try to dig up the old profiles.

but this is a kind of machine where I assume you've plenty of ram and
you really want pte_highmem enabled (the sysctl can still be added but
you really must know what you're doing if you disable pte_highmem
there), I was more interested to hear the impact on mid-low end 1-2G
machines where pte_highmem isn't really necessary for most apps, and
there the sysctl may be useful for general purpose too. If it payoffs
significantly the sysctl could then be elaborated in an heuristic that
prefers lowmem pagetables until a certain threshold, and then it
fallbacks in highmem allocations, and the threshold depends on the
highmem/lowmem ratio plus a further tuning via sysctl).

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-08  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-05 16:36 -mmX 4G patches feedback Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-05 21:35   ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 22:16     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 11:55       ` -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 14:49         ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-06 15:59         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 16:13           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-06 16:39             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 17:24           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 17:57             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:54               ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 22:50                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 19:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 20:25             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07  6:03               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07  6:46                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07  7:23                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07  8:23                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:35                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 17:27                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07  7:25               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:39                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:58             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:01               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:21                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:18                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:34                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08  0:18                       ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-04-08  6:24                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 21:59                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 22:19                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 22:19                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:14                                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:22                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:42                                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:49                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 21:19       ` -mmX 4G patches feedback Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 21:49         ` Andrea Arcangeli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 17:59 -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Manfred Spraul
2004-04-06 18:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040408001845.GX26888@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ewhiting@amis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox