From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Local DoS (was: Strange 'zombie' problem both in 2.4 and 2.6)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:11:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200404091311.50787@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> (raw)
Hello.
Several days ago I've posted to linux-kernel describing "zombie problem"
related to sigqueue overflow.
Futher exploration of the problem showed that the reason of the described
behaviour is in user-space. There is a process that blocks a signal and
later receives tons of such signals. This effectively causes sigqueue
overflow.
The following program gives the same effect:
#include <signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
sigset_t set;
int i;
pid_t pid;
sigemptyset(&set);
sigaddset(&set, 40);
sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &set, 0);
pid = getpid();
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
kill(pid, 40);
while (1)
sleep(1);
}
Running this program on 2.4 or 2.6 kernel with
default /proc/sys/kernel/rtsig-max value will cause sigqueue overflow, and
all linuxthreads-based programs, INCLUDING DAEMONS RUNNING AS ROOT, will
stop receiving notifications about thread exits, so all completed threads
will become zombies. Exact reason why this is hapenning is described in
detail in my previous postings.
This is a local DoS.
Affected system services include (but are not limited to) mysql and clamav.
In fact, any linuxthreads application will be affected.
The problem is not that bad on 2.6, since NPTL is used instead of
linuxthreads, so there are no zombies from system daemons. However, bad
things still happen: when sigqueue is overflown, all processes get zeroed
siginfo, which causes random application misbehaviours (like hangs in
pthread_cancel()).
I don't know what is the correct solution for this issue. Probably there
should be per-process or per-user (but not systemwide) limits on number of
pending signals.
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-09 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-09 9:11 Nikita V. Youshchenko [this message]
2004-04-09 14:45 ` Local DoS (was: Strange 'zombie' problem both in 2.4 and 2.6) Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-13 13:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-06-14 17:01 ` David Lang
2004-06-15 0:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-06-15 1:31 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200404091311.50787@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su \
--to=yoush@cs.msu.su \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox