From: DervishD <raul@pleyades.net>
To: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Confused about 2.6 PnP support
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:05:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040412170515.GA670@DervishD> (raw)
Hi all :)
I'm on the way of upgrading to 2.6.x kernel, and since I don't
have ISA cards (I don't even have an ISA bus in my mobo), I disabled
ISA support in my config (CONFIG_ISA), but I've noticed that PnP
support (CONFIG_PNP) depends on it :?
AFAIK, PnP, strictly speaking, has nothing to do with the PCI
bus, but I think is common notation to talk about PnP referring
autoconfiguration of PCI cards, and I want to know if I need to
select PCI support for having my PCI cards correctly detected and
configured (currently my BIOS does the work), or if the PnP support
in kernel 2.6 is just for ISA cards. In addition to this, the PnP
BIOS support (which I think I may need so Linux correctly gets the
IO, IRQ and DMA settings for my parallel port) is marked as
EXPERIMENTAL (at least in 2.6.5)
I want to know if I must tell my BIOS I don't have a PnP OS or
if, on the contrary, I should tell my BIOS that my OS is not PnP (I
only use Linux) and deselect PnP support (as well as ISA support) in
my 2.6.x kernel. Personally, I don't mind setting 'Non PnP OS' in my
BIOS and remove both CONFIG_ISA and CONFIG_PNP.
BTW, ¿does Linux support rebalancing of PnP bus resources or I
better avoid conflicts...?
Thanks a lot in advance :)
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-12 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-12 17:05 DervishD [this message]
2004-04-14 5:08 ` Confused about 2.6 PnP support Adam Belay
2004-04-15 11:58 ` DervishD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040412170515.GA670@DervishD \
--to=raul@pleyades.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox