From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:49:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040414214900.GI1175@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040414213336.GC30663@havoc.gtf.org>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:33:36PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:25:39PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Sticking this in arch/*/Kconfig seems silly (as does much of the
> > duplication in said files). Can we stick this and other debug bits
> > under the kallsyms option in init/Kconfig instead? Or alternately move
> > debugging bits into their own file that gets included as appropriate.
>
> I would rather have an arch/generic/Kconfig.debug file that gets
> included. init/Kconfig may be generic, but its name hardly implies its
> purpose as used.
Yes, and it's rather a dumping ground too.
> There are clearly two classes of debug options, one arch-specific, and
> one not.
There is a third class of options that aren't intrinsically
arch-specific, but are currently implemented on only a subset of
architectures (eg kgdb), that I would argue properly belong in the
generic debug section.
--
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-14 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 7:43 [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 8:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 9:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 21:25 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-14 21:27 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 21:37 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-14 21:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 21:49 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-04-15 6:12 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-15 20:52 ` PATCH] Kconfig.debug family Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-15 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-04-15 21:36 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-04-15 21:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 8:27 ` [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks Tim Hockin
2004-04-14 8:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 13:31 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-14 15:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 8:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-14 8:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] <1KNjN-gZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1KNDc-Bv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1KNDg-Bv-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1KNMQ-Hs-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1KNWA-OH-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-14 12:14 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040414214900.GI1175@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox