From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Ian Morgan <imorgan@webcon.ca>
Cc: helpdeskie@bencastricum.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.5 Sensors & USB problems
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:51:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040418075140.6c118202.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404171944160.11425@dark.webcon.ca>
> Seems that the w83781d driver no longer detects whatever the sensor
> chip on the P4PE is, but I see there is now a new driver called asb100
> which does work. An old conflicting lm_sensors install was breaking
> the sensors-detect script, but once resolved it nicely detected the
> asb100.
The hardware monitoring chip on the P4PE is an Asus ASB100 "Bach". It
used to be somewhat supported by the w83781d driver (see as an
"as99127f" kind) but then a new, dedicated driver was developed by Mark
M. Hoffman, which works better. For this reason, support was dropped
from the w83781d, which explains why it suddenly stopped working.
I agree that this should have been advertised a little more, and I am
adding information about this on our 2.6 kernel dedicated page at the
moment.
> Can anyone explain, however, why my i2c bus showed up as number 0
> under linux <= 2.6.4, and now always as number 1 under linux 2.6.5?
> The is no number 0 any more.
The bus number allocation scheme is such that once a number has been
used once (since the machine last booted) it will not be used again.
This is admittedly not ideal and should be fixed. I suspect that the fix
isn't trivial because the current structures would make the new scheme
have a poor algorithmic complexity (O(2) maybe), but I haven't checked
yet. Greg, can you confirm?
This isn't critical (unless you cycle your i2c adapter drivers a great
number of times, but nodoby does this) which is why no attempt has been
made to fix it yet. Anyone with a nice fix is welcome however ;)
Thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-18 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 14:56 2.6.5 Sensors & USB problems Jean Delvare
2004-04-17 22:07 ` Ian Morgan
2004-04-17 23:49 ` Ian Morgan
2004-04-18 5:51 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2004-05-04 20:37 ` Greg KH
2004-05-06 17:41 ` Jean Delvare
2004-04-18 5:32 ` Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 16:18 Ben Castricum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040418075140.6c118202.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=helpdeskie@bencastricum.nl \
--cc=imorgan@webcon.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox