From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@free.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Questions : disk partition re-reading
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:36:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040420143634.GA12132@bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040420074650.GA3040@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> You must distinguish the on-disk partition table and the kernel
> partition table. You can change the on-disk partition table just by
> writing to it, but that does not change the kernel's ideas.
> You can change the kernel partition table using the right ioctls
> but that does not change the bits on disk.
>
> Usually one does
> blockdev --rereadpt /dev/something
> after changing media, or after writing to the partition table,
> but that will fail if the disk is busy.
Which reminds me: Too bad the kernel says "Busy" without really
thinking aboutit.
Assume that I have a
<hda1> swap 1G (*)
<hda2> root 19G (active)
<free space>
disk, and want to add an extra partition. Maybe I have a 20G image
which I want to copy onto 20, 40, 60, 80, 120 and 200Gb disks. I can
then add the third partition as a /data or a /tmp partition. However
as the active root is on that disk I have to reboot. But in fact I
don't intend to change the active partition.
So, there should be objections if I want the new partitioning scheme
to be:
<hda1> swap 1.5G
<hda2> root 19G (active)
<free space>
then there is a problem and I can understand "Busy". But if the new
scheme is:
<hda1> swap 1G
<hda2> root 19G (active)
<hda3> data 20G <unformatted>
then I don't understand the reason for refusing the rereadpt request.
Anybody want to code this up?
Roger.
(*) usually active as well, but easily deactivated. So lets pretend
it's inactive for this discussion.
--
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
**** "Linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, apache inside!" ****
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-20 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-18 13:24 Questions : disk partition re-reading Remi Colinet
[not found] ` <200404181707.10467.christian.kroener@tu-harburg.de>
2004-04-18 14:40 ` Remi Colinet
2004-04-18 17:58 ` DervishD
2004-04-19 3:49 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-04-19 11:39 ` Erik Mouw
2004-04-19 22:37 ` Rob Couto
2004-04-20 7:46 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-20 14:36 ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2004-04-25 22:15 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-26 8:31 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-04-26 15:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-04-29 0:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-29 0:15 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-29 8:04 ` Wichert Akkerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040420143634.GA12132@bitwizard.nl \
--to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=remi.colinet@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox