public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@free.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Questions : disk partition re-reading
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:36:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040420143634.GA12132@bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040420074650.GA3040@pclin040.win.tue.nl>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> You must distinguish the on-disk partition table and the kernel
> partition table. You can change the on-disk partition table just by
> writing to it, but that does not change the kernel's ideas.
> You can change the kernel partition table using the right ioctls
> but that does not change the bits on disk.
> 
> Usually one does
> 	blockdev --rereadpt /dev/something
> after changing media, or after writing to the partition table,
> but that will fail if the disk is busy.

Which reminds me: Too bad the kernel says "Busy" without really
thinking aboutit. 

Assume that I have a 
	<hda1> swap 1G    (*)
	<hda2> root 19G   (active)
        <free space> 

disk, and want to add an extra partition. Maybe I have a 20G image
which I want to copy onto 20, 40, 60, 80, 120 and 200Gb disks. I can
then add the third partition as a /data or a /tmp partition. However
as the active root is on that disk I have to reboot. But in fact I
don't intend to change the active partition. 

So, there should be objections if I want the new partitioning scheme
to be: 

	<hda1> swap 1.5G 
	<hda2> root 19G   (active)
        <free space> 

then there is a problem and I can understand "Busy".  But if the new
scheme is: 

	<hda1> swap 1G  
	<hda2> root 19G   (active)
        <hda3> data 20G   <unformatted>

then I don't understand the reason for refusing the rereadpt request.

Anybody want to code this up?


	Roger. 


(*) usually active as well, but easily deactivated. So lets pretend
it's inactive for this discussion. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
**** "Linux is like a wigwam -  no windows, no gates, apache inside!" ****

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-20 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-18 13:24 Questions : disk partition re-reading Remi Colinet
     [not found] ` <200404181707.10467.christian.kroener@tu-harburg.de>
2004-04-18 14:40   ` Remi Colinet
2004-04-18 17:58 ` DervishD
2004-04-19  3:49 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-04-19 11:39 ` Erik Mouw
2004-04-19 22:37 ` Rob Couto
2004-04-20  7:46 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-20 14:36   ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2004-04-25 22:15     ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-26  8:31       ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-04-26 15:21         ` Bill Davidsen
2004-04-29  0:26           ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-29  0:15         ` Andries Brouwer
2004-04-29  8:04           ` Wichert Akkerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040420143634.GA12132@bitwizard.nl \
    --to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
    --cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=remi.colinet@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox