From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bitmap, cpumask_arith (was: 2.6.6-rc1-mm1)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:38:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040420213803.GM743@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040420141713.3974e13b.pj@sgi.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:17:13PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I tried making this point before, but failed to communicate. Let me try
> again. So far as I know, there is no instance in current Linux kernel
> code using this cpumask facility that is affected (currently broken) by
> the cpumask_arith bugs addressed by Bill's patch. Do you know of any
> breakage in other _current_ code caused by these cpumask_arith bugs,
> Bill?
> As a consequence of my seeing nothing else yet overtly busted by this,
> it was, and remains, my recommendation to Bill to hold off on these
> patches. Little sense in correcting the semantics of a piece of code
> that I expected to remove shortly anyway, if nothing else cared for now.
> However, I realize that Bill takes considerable pride in his work, and
> would like to see this fixed. It's not worth a big fuss, either way,
> so far as I can tell.
I thought you were reporting some instance affected by it. Since there's
no report of anyone affected by it, and a cleanup/whatever pending, I'm
dropping the bugfix patch(es).
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-20 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-19 6:01 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-04-19 6:29 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-19 6:42 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-04-19 6:49 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-19 7:06 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-19 18:39 ` bitmap, cpumask_arith (was: 2.6.6-rc1-mm1) Paul Jackson
2004-04-20 21:17 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-20 21:38 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-04-19 6:58 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Nick Piggin
2004-04-19 9:13 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 failure: kmod.o didn't compile with module-less setup Helge Hafting
2004-04-19 9:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-19 15:26 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-04-19 19:25 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 1:13 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Ian Kent
2004-04-20 1:26 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-04-21 9:08 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 12:31 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-21 13:18 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 13:34 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-21 15:52 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-21 16:09 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 12:39 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-21 13:19 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 13:52 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-21 14:56 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:39 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-20 14:27 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 raven
2004-04-20 15:06 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Rik van Riel
2004-04-21 7:37 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Sean Neakums
2004-04-21 12:16 ` 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040420213803.GM743@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox