From: Willy Tarreau <w@w.ods.org>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@hera.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.4.26 released
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:42:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040421104231.GA2558@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421101244.GX743@holomorphy.com>
Hi William,
sorry for the noise, you're right. I didn't notice the '/4' before '*16',
so I thought 2 bits were missing.
Thanks for your explanation.
Willy
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:12:44AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:23:12PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> - return (mps_cpu/4)*16 + (1<<(mps_cpu%4));
> >> + return (mps_cpu & ~0x3) << 2 | 1 << (mps_cpu & 0x3);
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:53:44AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I think you wanted to put '<< 4' here instead of '<< 2'. Also, could you
> > put (useless for some) parenthesis to group the left side and the right
> > side of the bit-wise OR ? I'm always scared that someone changes it to
> > an addition with good intentions and changes the operators precedence
> > without noticing.
>
> The important thing here is the bit movement.
>
> apicid[7]: mps_cpu[5]
> apicid[6]: mps_cpu[4]
> apicid[5]: mps_cpu[3]
> apicid[4]: mps_cpu[2]
> apicid[3]: mps_cpu[1] && mps_cpu[0] |
> apicid[2]: mps_cpu[1] && !mps_cpu[0] | == 1 << mps_cpu[0:1]
> apicid[1]: !mps_cpu[1] && mps_cpu[0] |
> apicid[0]: !mps_cpu[1] && !mps_cpu[0] |
>
> apicid[4:7] and mps_cpu[2:5] encode the cluster ID for use by the
> clustered hierarchical DFR local APIC ID settings (which in this case
> are done by the BIOS, not the OS). apicid[0:3] is an architecturally
> defined cluster-local cpumask, which as it's 4 bits, only needs 2 bits
> to densely encode within mps_cpu[0:1]. The mps_cpu values are basically
> BIOS-defined and the mps_cpu values are computed from auxiliary tables
> provided by the BIOS in combination with the serial APIC's physical
> APIC ID's (which are provided as 0, 1, 2, 4; the computation in mpparse.c
> logical_apicid = (quad << 4) +
> (m->mpc_apicid ? m->mpc_apicid << 1 : 1);
> is easily tabulated as (quad << 4) | one of 1 2 4 8. The way that the
> various information is compacted into a NR_CPUS-sized array indexed by
> the logical APIC ID is with the computation carrying the clustered
> hierarchical logical APIC ID to the | of the cluster ID shifted right
> by 2, and the __ffs() of the lower 4 bits of the logical APIC ID (the
> "local" logical APIC ID) so as to match later-used mps_cpu values. It
> appears, though, that the majority of the arrays indexed in this way,
> e.g. bios_cpu[], have been removed (excepting raw_phys_apicid[] etc.).
>
> So the proof of all this is:
>
> (a) mps_cpu % 4 == mps_cpu & 0x3
> The right side of the | is equal to the right side of the +
> (b) (mps_cpu & ~0x3) << 2
> == mps_cpu[3:7] << 4
> == (mps_cpu/4) << 4
> == 16*(mps_cpu/4)
> The left side of the | is equal to the left side of the +
> (c) ((mps_cpu & ~0x3) << 2) & (1 << (mps_cpu & 0x3))
> == (mps_cpu[3:7] << 4) & (1 << (mps_cpu & 0x3))
> == 0
> Because shifting 1 by mps_cpu & 0x3 on the left can set no bit
> higher than 3, but the right side is shifted left by 4, which
> is out of its reach.
> So there are no carries, and the | is equivalent to the +.
>
> The ~, <<, &, and | version clarifies the bit movement. The definitions
> are in terms of bit extraction, which matches the patch more closely
> than the in-tree arithmetic definition.
>
>
> -- wli
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-21 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 13:14 linux-2.4.26 released Marcelo Tosatti
2004-04-20 23:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-21 4:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-04-21 8:25 ` Axel Weiß
2004-04-21 10:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-21 10:42 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040421104231.GA2558@alpha.home.local \
--to=w@w.ods.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@hera.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox