From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390 (9/9): no timer interrupts in idle.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:31:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040421163148.B7211@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421144948.GJ2951@mschwid3.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>; from schwidefsky@de.ibm.com on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:49:48PM +0200
> +++ linux-2.6-s390/include/linux/rcupdate.h Wed Apr 21 16:29:41 2004
> @@ -121,6 +121,34 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
> +
> +extern cpumask_t idle_cpu_mask;
> +
> +/*
> + * RCU is build for ticking systems. Without the HZ timer
> + * we have not enought state changes which may result in a
> + * never finished RCU request.
> + * In a tickless system we don't want to wake idle CPUs just
> + * to finish the RCU request. That is possible because the
> + * idle CPUs satisfy the quiescilant RCU condition anyway.
> + */
> +static inline void rcu_set_active_cpu_map(cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> + cpumask_t active = idle_cpu_mask;
> + cpus_complement(active);
> + cpus_and(*mask, cpu_online_map, active);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline void rcu_set_active_cpu_map(cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> + *mask = cpu_online_map;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
This is a bit ugly. What about inlining the CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ case
of this function in it's only caller and define idle_cpu_mask to
an empty cpu mask for all other arches?
> --- linux-2.6/include/linux/sysctl.h Wed Apr 21 16:29:19 2004
> +++ linux-2.6-s390/include/linux/sysctl.h Wed Apr 21 16:29:41 2004
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
> KERN_PTY=62, /* dir: pty driver */
> KERN_NGROUPS_MAX=63, /* int: NGROUPS_MAX */
> KERN_SPARC_SCONS_PWROFF=64, /* int: serial console power-off halt */
> + KERN_S390_HZ_TIMER=64, /* int: hz timer on or off */
Kill the S390, this seems usefull for a bunch of other architectures.
> --- linux-2.6/include/linux/timer.h Sun Apr 4 05:37:37 2004
> +++ linux-2.6-s390/include/linux/timer.h Wed Apr 21 16:29:41 2004
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@
> extern int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
> extern int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
> +extern unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(void);
> +#endif
kill the ifdef. externs don't need to be cpp'ed away.
> --- linux-2.6/kernel/sysctl.c Wed Apr 21 16:29:19 2004
> +++ linux-2.6-s390/kernel/sysctl.c Wed Apr 21 16:29:41 2004
> @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@
> extern int sysctl_userprocess_debug;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
> +extern int sysctl_hz_timer;
dito.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-21 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-21 14:49 [PATCH] s390 (9/9): no timer interrupts in idle Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-21 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-04-22 8:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-21 16:31 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-21 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 16:37 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-21 20:43 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-04-21 20:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 21:01 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-04-21 18:52 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-21 21:58 ` Dipankar Sarma
[not found] <1Nt5d-84u-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1NwPD-2RW-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1NwPE-2RW-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1Nx8Y-3ev-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-21 22:38 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-22 8:48 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-22 8:55 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 10:53 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 10:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-22 11:09 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 11:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-22 12:14 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 12:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-22 12:44 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-22 13:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-23 3:32 ` George Anzinger
2004-04-22 14:56 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-28 19:07 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-04-23 8:48 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-29 7:43 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-29 8:16 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-04-29 8:24 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-29 12:06 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040421163148.B7211@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox