From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch 1 of 17] cpumask v4 - Document bitmap.c bit model
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:05:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040422000506.6ec1a26c.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421232247.22ffe1f2.pj@sgi.com>
mask1-bitmap-comment - Document bitmap.c bit model.
Document the bitmap bit model, including handling of unused bits,
and operation preconditions and postconditions.
Index: 2.6.5.bitmap/lib/bitmap.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.5.bitmap.orig/lib/bitmap.c 2004-04-05 02:00:15.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.5.bitmap/lib/bitmap.c 2004-04-05 02:50:25.000000000 -0700
@@ -12,6 +12,26 @@
#include <asm/bitops.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+/*
+ * bitmaps provide an array of bits, implemented using an an
+ * array of unsigned longs. The number of valid bits in a
+ * given bitmap need not be an exact multiple of BITS_PER_LONG.
+ *
+ * The possible unused bits in the last, partially used word
+ * of a bitmap are 'don't care'. The implementation makes
+ * no particular effort to keep them zero. It ensures that
+ * their value will not affect the results of any operation.
+ * The bitmap operations that return Boolean (bitmap_empty,
+ * for example) or scalar (bitmap_weight, for example) results
+ * carefully filter out these unused bits from impacting their
+ * results.
+ *
+ * Except for bitmap_complement, these operations hold to a
+ * slightly stronger rule: if you don't input any bitmaps to
+ * these ops that have some unused bits set, then they won't
+ * output any set unused bits in output bitmaps.
+ */
+
#define MAX_BITMAP_BITS 512U /* for ia64 NR_CPUS maximum */
int bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *bitmap, int bits)
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-22 6:22 [Patch 0 of 17] cpumask v4 - bitmap and cpumask cleanup Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:05 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2004-04-22 7:06 ` [Patch 2 of 17] cpumask v4 - Dont generate nonzero unused bits in bitmap Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 3 of 17] cpumask v4 - New bitmap operators and two op complement Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 4 of 17] cpumask v4 - two missing 'const' qualifiers in bitops/bitmap Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 5 of 17] cpumask v4 - Optimize and extend bitmap Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 6 of 17] cpumask v4 - Uninline find_next_bit on ia64 Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 7 of 17] cpumask v4 - Rewrite cpumask.h to use bitmap directly Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 8 of 17] cpumask v4 - Remove 26 no longer used cpumask headers Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 9 of 17] cpumask v4 - Recode obsolete cpumask macros - arch i386 Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 10 of 17] cpumask v4 - Recode obsolete cpumask macros - arch ppc64 Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 11 of 17] cpumask v4 - Recode obsolete cpumask macros - arch x86_64 Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 12 of 17] cpumask v4 - Remove obsolete emulation from cpumask.h Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 13 of 17] cpumask v4 - Simplify some sparc64 cpumask loop code Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 14 of 17] cpumask v4 - Optimize i386 cpumask macro usage Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 15 of 17] cpumask v4 - Convert physids_complement() to use both args Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 16 of 17] cpumask v4 - Remove cpumask hack from asm-x86_64/topology.h Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 7:07 ` [Patch 17 of 17] cpumask v4 - Cpumask code clarification in kernel/sched.c Paul Jackson
2004-04-22 16:25 ` [Patch 0 of 17] cpumask v4 - bitmap and cpumask cleanup Joe Korty
2004-04-22 17:00 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040422000506.6ec1a26c.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox