From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Bob Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sym53c500_cs PCMCIA SCSI driver (round 3 - the charm?)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:33:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040425223341.C13748@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040425212634.18513DBDB@gherkin.frus.com>; from rct@gherkin.frus.com on Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:26:34PM -0500
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:26:34PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Hmm, so what happens if you're in the middle of a transaction, and
> > you receive a CS_EVENT_CARD_RESET. What happens to the command in
> > progress ?
>
> Candidly, I don't know. A fair question to ask in return is, under
> what circumstances might a PCMCIA driver see a CS_EVENT_CARD_RESET?
When the user issues "cardctl reset"
> None of the existing PCMCIA SCSI drivers I saw do anything other than
> reset the hardware: evidently the assumption is there's no command in
> progress at that point, or we don't care. The nsp_cs driver toggles a
> stop flag in the per-instance data to indicate the host is accepting
> I/O: the flag is set to block I/O upon receipt of a suspend, physical
> reset, or card removal event. The card reset code in the nsp_cs driver,
> as in mine, is a subset of (fall-through case for) the resume logic.
>
> Given the above, I'm tempted to believe the mid and/or upper driver
> layers are handling the "command in progress" issue, but I haven't
> delved into that code deeply enough to know.
>From the brief look I had, it didn't look like it - I suspect things
will go gaga if someone ever invoked "cardctl reset".
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-25 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-10 2:17 [PATCH] sym53c500_cs PCMCIA SCSI driver (new) Bob Tracy
2004-04-16 12:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-16 14:17 ` Bob Tracy
2004-04-17 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 16:11 ` [PATCH] sym53c500_cs PCMCIA SCSI driver (second round) Bob Tracy
2004-04-20 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-25 3:01 ` [PATCH] sym53c500_cs PCMCIA SCSI driver (round 3 - the charm?) Bob Tracy
2004-04-25 7:36 ` Russell King
2004-04-25 21:26 ` Bob Tracy
2004-04-25 21:33 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-04-25 22:59 ` Bob Tracy
2004-04-22 19:38 ` [PATCH] sym53c500_cs PCMCIA SCSI driver (new) Bill Davidsen
2004-04-22 20:48 ` Bob Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040425223341.C13748@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rct@gherkin.frus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox