Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

Timothy Miller
2004-04-28T20:08:13Z

Marc Boucher wrote:
>
> Timothy,
>
> I am truly sorry about the concern this has caused, have already
> publicly apologized for not submitting a patch to properly correct the
> issue when the workaround was implemented, and proposed a change to the
> modem drivers that should go in as soon as possible to restore tainting
> and one instance of the warning messages while avoiding the flood.

I was not personally offended, but I hope what you said here is taken by
others as a good-faith gesture.

>
> At the same time, I think that the "community" should, without
> relinquishing its principles, be less eager before getting the facts to
> attack people and companies trying to help in good faith, and be more
> realistic when it comes to satisfying practical needs of ordinary users.

This is just part of the community, something which you should learn to
take advantage of. It's part of an impressive system of checks and
balances.

A major principle of internet communication is that people will say
venomous things in email which they would never say to you in person.
You have to take what they say for what it MEANS, not what it looks like.

If you're flamed, particularly in a forum like LKML, pay attention to
the meat of what the person is saying. If the person is right, GREAT.
If the person has completely misunderstood the situation, let it go.

And then, don't get drawn into endless debate defending yourself to
every comment that people make. Sometimes, it's best to just summarize
the situation, acknowledge people's complaints, explain which ones are
factual, and explain that you're working on a solution.

There are a number of people on LKML who seem to do an amazing job of
getting to the point in a debate. Take Theodore Ts'o, for example. In
particular, his posts are a pleasure to read because they are so clear
and full of knowledge.