Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

Tomas Szepe
2004-05-01T09:20:28Z

On Apr-28 2004, Wed, 01:59 +0200
Robert M. Stockmann <stock@stokkie.net> wrote:

> > > The needed header files, which need to be read by the gcc compiler, contain
> > > unnamed and annonymizes structures and unions. In the worst case scenario,
> > > only the name of used variables are given and no info about variable type or
> > > size are inside these headers files. gcc-2.95.3 fails to succesfully link these
> >
> > Opaque types have been available FOREVER.
>
> sure, but can one qualify that as Open Source?

Are you familiar with my friend "void *"?

--
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>