From: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org, dheger@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dentry and inode cache hash algorithm performance changes.
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:33:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040430213324.GK14271@rx8.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040430205701.GG14271@rx8.ibm.com> (from jrsantos@austin.ibm.com on Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 15:57:01 -0500)
On 04/30/04 15:57:01, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> err... Wrote the patch to fast. It should read
>
> tmp = (hashval * sb) ^ (GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME + hashval) / L1_CACHE_BYTES
>
> I screw up... I'll send a fixed patch in a while.
Just notice I've made another error in the inode hash code.
Fixed patch (I hope) with beautification.
-JRS
diff -Nru a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
--- a/fs/dcache.c Fri Apr 30 16:27:41 2004
+++ b/fs/dcache.c Fri Apr 30 16:27:41 2004
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
+#include <linux/hash.h>
#define DCACHE_PARANOIA 1
/* #define DCACHE_DEBUG 1 */
@@ -799,8 +800,8 @@
static inline struct hlist_head * d_hash(struct dentry * parent, unsigned long hash)
{
- hash += (unsigned long) parent / L1_CACHE_BYTES;
- hash = hash ^ (hash >> D_HASHBITS);
+ hash += ((unsigned long) parent ^ GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME) / L1_CACHE_BYTES;
+ hash = hash ^ ((hash ^ GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME) >> D_HASHBITS);
return dentry_hashtable + (hash & D_HASHMASK);
}
diff -Nru a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
--- a/fs/inode.c Fri Apr 30 16:27:41 2004
+++ b/fs/inode.c Fri Apr 30 16:27:41 2004
@@ -671,12 +671,13 @@
static inline unsigned long hash(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long hashval)
{
- unsigned long tmp = hashval + ((unsigned long) sb / L1_CACHE_BYTES);
- tmp = tmp + (tmp >> I_HASHBITS);
+ unsigned long tmp;
+
+ tmp = (hashval * (unsigned long)sb) ^ (GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME + hashval) /
+ L1_CACHE_BYTES;
+ tmp = tmp ^ ((tmp ^ GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME) >> I_HASHBITS);
return tmp & I_HASHMASK;
}
-
-/* Yeah, I know about quadratic hash. Maybe, later. */
/**
* iunique - get a unique inode number
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-30 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040430191539.GC14271@rx8.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20040430131832.45be6956.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-04-30 20:57 ` [PATCH] dentry and inode cache hash algorithm performance changes Jose R. Santos
2004-04-30 21:33 ` Jose R. Santos [this message]
2004-04-30 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-30 23:42 ` Jose R. Santos
2004-05-04 13:12 ` Jose R. Santos
2004-05-04 18:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-07 13:04 ` Jose R. Santos
2004-05-08 1:03 ` Dave Hansen
2004-04-30 19:55 Jose R. Santos
2004-05-01 12:08 ` Olaf Dietsche
2004-05-01 15:08 ` Jose R. Santos
2004-05-20 13:34 ` Raghavan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040430213324.GK14271@rx8.ibm.com \
--to=jrsantos@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dheger@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox