From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Michael Brown <mebrown@michaels-house.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] add SMBIOS information to /proc/smbios -- UPDATED
Date: 1 May 2004 17:01:36 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 17:01:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040501150136.GA23636@colin2.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083382204.1203.2971.camel@debian>
> -- This information is, in the very near future, _not_ going to be
> static anymore. There will be systems that update the information in
> dynamically during SMIs.
That's fine - /dev/mem can handle that too. An user will have to
poll for changes anyways, so having it it /proc does not have
any advantages.
I would see the sense if there was an interrupt to notify the
the system of changes, but there isn't ;-)
>
> -- SMBIOS consists of two things, the table entry point and the table
> itself. The table entry point is always in 0xF0000 - 0xFFFFF.
> Traditionally, the actual table has been here as well. BIOS is running
> out of space here and future systems are moving this information to high
> memory. /dev/mem will not allow access to memory above top of system
> RAM.
mmap /dev/mem of high memory should work. Did you try it?
For read/write it would be fairly easy to add, just needs a kmap.
> -- Red Hat has a /dev/mem patch in their tree that restricts access to
> RAM above 1MB.
That's their breakage.
Clearly it is a useless change anyways because you can easily circumvent
it by just accessing any bus master hardware in the system.
> This procfs/sysfs driver allows access to smbios information by
> non-root, non CAP_SYS_RAWIO users. I've had several occasions where I
> have been bitten by having to be root to read smbios when I did not need
> root for anything else.
That is what suid root was invented for. It is a fairly nifty mechanism,
did you ever try it? I know that some sysadmins try to get away from
it, but that is clearly misguided because it is not any more dangerous than
adding more kernel code.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-01 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1QvX0-A4-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-30 19:22 ` [PATCH 2.4] add SMBIOS information to /proc/smbios -- UPDATED Andi Kleen
2004-05-01 3:30 ` Michael Brown
2004-05-01 3:43 ` Michael Brown
2004-05-01 15:01 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-05-03 23:49 Michael_E_Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-01 21:00 Lev Makhlis
2004-05-01 21:20 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-30 2:21 Michael Brown
2004-04-30 3:34 ` viro
2004-04-30 4:37 ` Michael Brown
2004-05-03 23:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040501150136.GA23636@colin2.muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=mebrown@michaels-house.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox