From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262311AbUEAQ0r (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 12:26:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262380AbUEAQ0q (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 12:26:46 -0400 Received: from [12.177.129.25] ([12.177.129.25]:48323 "EHLO ccure.user-mode-linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262311AbUEAQ0p (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 12:26:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 13:09:05 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@sourceforge.net Subject: [PATCH] UML/x86_64 Message-ID: <20040501170905.GA7655@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org UML has been ported to x86_64. The patch for 2.6.4 is available at http://www.user-mode-linux.org/mirror/uml-patch-x86-64-2.6.4.bz2 Note that this is separate from the 2.6.4 UML patch, and must be applied to a 2.6.4 + uml-patch-2.6.4 tree. It will remain separate until I get it all merged cleanly into my tree. At that point, the separate x86_64 patch will disappear. This patch is fairly nasty in places, and the build is also fairly unclean, so avert your eyes if you are squeamish. This will get better as I merge it into my pool. The nastiness aside, it does build and you do get a robust UML. My thanks go to PathScale (pathscale.com) for sponsoring this work and providing access to hardware to make it possible. Finally, as I do the merge (and afterwards), I need access to an Opteron to make sure I don't break this port. So, if anyone has such a box that I can have access to, let me know. Jeff