From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261752AbUEEABr (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 20:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261763AbUEEABr (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 20:01:47 -0400 Received: from delerium.kernelslacker.org ([81.187.208.145]:3535 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261752AbUEEABq (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2004 20:01:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 01:01:05 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Michal Semler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Marcello: cpufreq in 2.4.27??? Message-ID: <20040505000105.GA29963@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Michal Semler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200405042148.36999.cijoml@volny.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405042148.36999.cijoml@volny.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:48:36PM +0200, Michal Semler wrote: > is it possible to include cpufreq into 2.4.27? We have new acpi, SATA, XFS > included, so why not include cpufreq? I'd bet largely because the upstream cpufreq maintainers don't have time to maintain a 2.4 branch of it too. Bruno Ducrot has been doing occasional backports, but it's a lot of work, and if it got merged in 2.4, it'd likely only increase the amount of work necessary. Dave