From: Libor Vanek <libor@conet.cz>
To: Bart Samwel <bart@samwel.tk>
Cc: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Read from file fails
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:54:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040505095406.GC5767@Loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4097A94C.8060403@samwel.tk>
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Bart Samwel wrote:
> Libor Vanek wrote:
> >I know that kernel threads work. My question was more like: "I'd
> > like to know, whether writing my module as kernel thread will make
> > it able to read/write files".
> [...]
> >>>I think there are reasons (speed, speed, speed...) why some things
> >>> should be done kernel-space.
>
> Using a kernel thread won't improve speed, because to do anything you
> will have to context-switch to the thread. For the stuff you want to do
> you are probably better off having a tiny kernel module to intercept the
> events that you're interested in, notifying a userspace process to do
OK - how can I "notify" userspace process? Signals are "weak" - I need to send some data (filename etc.) to process. One solution is "on this signal call this syscall and result of this syscall will be data you need" - but I'd prefer to handle this in one "action".
> the real work. Yes, it will be slower than in kernel space, but only
> slightly. Especially if you use sendfile from the userspace process. And
> it's also good to remember that Linux is optimized for running user
> space processes as fast as possible. :)
>
> --Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-05 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-03 0:00 Read from file fails Libor Vanek
2004-05-03 13:11 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-05-03 15:06 ` Libor Vanek
2004-05-04 0:47 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-05-04 1:19 ` Libor Vanek
2004-05-04 13:49 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-05-05 10:34 ` Libor Vanek
2004-05-04 14:31 ` Bart Samwel
2004-05-05 9:54 ` Libor Vanek [this message]
2004-05-05 10:04 ` Bart Samwel
2004-05-05 10:19 ` Libor Vanek
2004-05-05 10:45 ` Bart Samwel
2004-05-05 11:22 ` Libor Vanek
2004-05-05 11:50 ` Bart Samwel
2004-05-05 10:54 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-05-05 11:58 ` Michael Clark
2004-05-04 18:45 ` Paulo Marques
2004-05-05 9:47 ` Libor Vanek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040505095406.GC5767@Loki \
--to=libor@conet.cz \
--cc=bart@samwel.tk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox