From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264705AbUEEXni (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 19:43:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264699AbUEEXni (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 19:43:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:64465 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264705AbUEEXnY (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 19:43:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 16:42:05 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Matt Domsch Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI devices with no PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE implemented Message-ID: <20040505234205.GA31119@kroah.com> References: <20040429195301.GB15106@lists.us.dell.com> <20040505223102.GF30003@kroah.com> <20040505224847.GA2283@lists.us.dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040505224847.GA2283@lists.us.dell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:48:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:31:02PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:53:01PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > a) need this be a warning, wouldn't KERN_DEBUG suffice, if a message > > > is needed at all? This is printed in pci_generic_prep_mwi(). > > > > Yes, we should make that KERN_DEBUG. I don't have a problem with that. > > Care to make a patch? > > Appended for 2.6.6-rc3. I'll send a 2.4.x patch separately. I've applied this for 2.6. I'm not the 2.4 pci maintainer, so I can't help you out there, sorry. greg k-h